(414) 921-1945

dan@defensewisconsin.com

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Areas of Practice
    • OWI / Drunk Driving
    • Drug Crimes
    • Domestic Violence
    • White Collar / Business Offenses
    • Campus Discipline
    • Federal Crimes
    • Traffic and Municipal Offenses
    • Pre-charge Representation
  • Legal Updates
  • In The News
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Areas of Practice
    • OWI / Drunk Driving
    • Drug Crimes
    • Domestic Violence
    • White Collar / Business Offenses
    • Campus Discipline
    • Federal Crimes
    • Traffic and Municipal Offenses
    • Pre-charge Representation
  • Legal Updates
  • In The News
  • Contact Us

Defense Attorneys must anticipate arguments about uncharged and unproven conduct

Posted:
July 28th, 2012

Tags:
Criminal Defense, mitigation arguments, OWI, sentencing arguments

In a recent unpublished opinion[1], the Wisconsin Supreme Court reminds us of the State’s right to use uncharged and unproven conduct in their sentencing arguments.  The opinion highlights the need for defense attorneys to: 1. Be precise when negotiating a plea bargain.  A plea bargain is, after all, an extremely important contractual arrangement between a defendant and the government. 2. Anticipate and be ready to counter all of the State’s arguments.

In the recent opinion, the State agreed to dismiss a number of the charges the defendant was facing in return for a plea.  There was no agreement as to whether the defendant acknowledged his culpability as to the dismissed charges.  The court used the conduct of the dismissed charges to formulate a stiff sentence.

In negotiating a plea bargain, it is well within the defense’s right to ask that uncharged or unproven conduct not be argued by the State as an aggravating factor at sentencing.  Further, the defense may ask for an agreement from the State that the conduct was groundless or unreliable and should not be used by the court in fashioning a proper sentence.

A plea bargain may be the most important contract a person enters into in their entire lives.  Defense attorneys must pay attention to the details involved in these contracts.


[1] State v. Frey, 337 Wis. 2d 429.


  • Criminal Defense
  • mitigation arguments
  • OWI
  • sentencing arguments

Share This Post

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Dribble
  • Google Plus
  • Behance

About

Related Posts

Contact Info

1200 E. Capitol Drive, Suite 360, Milwaukee, WI 53211

(414) 921-1945
Please call to talk to Dan anytime, 24/7/365

dan@defensewisconsin.com

Free Consultation *

Name*

E-mail*

Popular Posts

Fighting a criminal possession charge in Wisconsin
one comment
Penalties for Possession of Marijuana Still Serious in Wisconsin
one comment
Seeking a diversion or deferred prosecution agreement for a Wisconsin drug offense
one comment
  • A Focus on Drug Overdose Homicide Cases
  • About Us
  • Areas of Practice
    • OWI / Drunk Driving
    • Drug Crimes
    • Domestic Violence
    • White Collar / Business Offenses
    • Campus Discipline
    • Federal Crimes
    • Traffic and Municipal Offenses
    • Pre-charge Representation
  • Common Offenses – Plea Form
  • Contact Us
  • Drug Offense – Plea Form
  • Home
  • Legal Updates
  • OWI – Plea Form
  • Payments
  • Text a Ticket

Copyright © 2016 Adams Law Group, LLC. All rights reserved.

* Consultations are discussions to determine whether you wish to retain Adams Laaw Group, LLC and whether we agree to represent you. A consultation does not result in legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship.