(414) 921-1945

dan@defensewisconsin.com

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Areas of Practice
    • OWI / Drunk Driving
    • Drug Crimes
    • Domestic Violence
    • White Collar / Business Offenses
    • Campus Discipline
    • Federal Crimes
    • Traffic and Municipal Offenses
    • Pre-charge Representation
  • Legal Updates
  • In The News
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Areas of Practice
    • OWI / Drunk Driving
    • Drug Crimes
    • Domestic Violence
    • White Collar / Business Offenses
    • Campus Discipline
    • Federal Crimes
    • Traffic and Municipal Offenses
    • Pre-charge Representation
  • Legal Updates
  • In The News
  • Contact Us

What can be learned from Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers – advocating against pretrial detention in federal cases.

Posted:
July 23rd, 2019

Tags:
Criminal Law, Epstein, Federal Charges, Pretrial Detention

Most law is derivative – lawyers regularly use the previous work of others to hone arguments and further their client’s interests. Early in my career, I would go to the Milwaukee County Clerk of Courts office and pull files from high profile cases to see how more experienced criminal defense lawyers wrote their motions. On occasion, I still review high profile case files from nationally important cases because I’m always looking to improve my advocacy on behalf of my clients.


Today there is no higher profile case than Jeffrey Epstein’s federal case in the Southern District of New York. And because of his extreme wealth, his legal team is crafting very good work product. Indeed, one of their initial pleadings on his behalf, a letter written to his assigned judge to argue against pretrial detention, is spectacular both in addressing the substance of the pretrial detention law and persuasiveness in applying Epstein’s own case facts to that law. 

 

First, the letter alerts the judge to the defendant’s willingness to abide by a stringent set of conditions to ensure he does not flee or pose a risk to the community prior to his trial. Epstein’s attorneys lead with this idea – and then return to the specifics of the conditions later in the document.


Next, the defense team strongly attacks the Government’s ability to even initiate a case against Epstein given his earlier Non-Prosecution Agreement which was a global settlement of all criminal liability in 2007. As widely-reported, whether this agreement nullifies the current charges against Epstein is likely his strongest defense. Epstein’s attorneys make a persuasive and detailed argument that the agreement precludes new charges. The defense also acknowledges the “bad facts” obviously present in the case – after all, Epstein did plea guilty in 2007, so these facts are somewhat inescapable. 

 

The defense then argues that the purpose of pretrial detention, as articulated by the 1984 Bail Reform Act, is not furthered in Epstein’s case. Citing the purpose of the law is the setup to then argue why the rebuttable presumption for detention under 18 USC 3142(e) should indeed be rebutted in Epstein’s case. 

 

Lastly, the defense lawyers run through conditions of release that would satisfy 18 USC 3142(c), notably a condition for GPS monitoring – which relates specifically to the case’s unique facts involving minor victims. 

 

Despite the very competent representation – where vast resources abound – Epstein’s judge denied his lawyers’ attempts to have him released pending trial finding that no amount of security or any set of conditions would suffice to ensure public safety or Epstein’s later appearance in court. Still their efforts are an example of excellent advocacy. 


You can read the entire Epstein letter here. 

 


  • Criminal Law
  • Epstein
  • Federal Charges
  • Pretrial Detention

Share This Post

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Dribble
  • Google Plus
  • Behance

About

Related Posts

Attorney Adams appears in PBS documentary

Attorney Adams appears in PBS documentary

May 10th, 2016
Defending Len Bias cases in Wisconsin

Defending Len Bias cases in Wisconsin

March 22nd, 2016

Recent Comments

  • Defenses to a Criminal Charge for a Possession Offense | D. Morgan Adams Law, LLC on Fighting a criminal possession charge in Wisconsin
  • Fight your Wisconsin drug possession charge | D. Morgan Adams Law, LLC on Seeking a diversion or deferred prosecution agreement for a Wisconsin drug offense
  • Fight your Wisconsin drug possession charge | D. Morgan Adams Law, LLC on Penalties for Possession of Marijuana Still Serious in Wisconsin

Contact Info

1200 E. Capitol Drive, Suite 360, Milwaukee, WI 53211

(414) 921-1945
Please call to talk to Dan anytime, 24/7/365

dan@defensewisconsin.com

Free Consultation *

Name*

E-mail*

Popular Posts

Fighting a criminal possession charge in Wisconsin
one comment
Penalties for Possession of Marijuana Still Serious in Wisconsin
one comment
Seeking a diversion or deferred prosecution agreement for a Wisconsin drug offense
one comment
  • A Focus on Drug Overdose Homicide Cases
  • About Us
  • Areas of Practice
    • OWI / Drunk Driving
    • Drug Crimes
    • Domestic Violence
    • White Collar / Business Offenses
    • Campus Discipline
    • Federal Crimes
    • Traffic and Municipal Offenses
    • Pre-charge Representation
  • Common Offenses – Plea Form
  • Contact Us
  • Drug Offense – Plea Form
  • Home
  • Legal Updates
  • OWI – Plea Form
  • Payments
  • Text a Ticket

Copyright © 2016 Adams Law Group, LLC. All rights reserved.

* Consultations are discussions to determine whether you wish to retain Adams Laaw Group, LLC and whether we agree to represent you. A consultation does not result in legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship.